3.16.56-rc1 review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Dan Williams <dan.j.willi...@intel.com>

commit babdde2698d482b6c0de1eab4f697cf5856c5859 upstream.

array_index_nospec() uses a mask to sanitize user controllable array
indexes, i.e. generate a 0 mask if 'index' >= 'size', and a ~0 mask
otherwise. While the default array_index_mask_nospec() handles the
carry-bit from the (index - size) result in software.

The x86 array_index_mask_nospec() does the same, but the carry-bit is
handled in the processor CF flag without conditional instructions in the
control flow.

Suggested-by: Linus Torvalds <torva...@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.willi...@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-a...@vger.kernel.org
Cc: kernel-harden...@lists.openwall.com
Cc: gre...@linuxfoundation.org
Cc: a...@linux.intel.com
Link: 
https://lkml.kernel.org/r/151727414808.33451.1873237130672785331.st...@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com
[bwh: Backported to 3.16: adjust context]
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <b...@decadent.org.uk>
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/barrier.h | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+)

--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/barrier.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/barrier.h
@@ -25,6 +25,30 @@
 #endif
 
 /**
+ * array_index_mask_nospec() - generate a mask that is ~0UL when the
+ *     bounds check succeeds and 0 otherwise
+ * @index: array element index
+ * @size: number of elements in array
+ *
+ * Returns:
+ *     0 - (index < size)
+ */
+static inline unsigned long array_index_mask_nospec(unsigned long index,
+               unsigned long size)
+{
+       unsigned long mask;
+
+       asm ("cmp %1,%2; sbb %0,%0;"
+                       :"=r" (mask)
+                       :"r"(size),"r" (index)
+                       :"cc");
+       return mask;
+}
+
+/* Override the default implementation from linux/nospec.h. */
+#define array_index_mask_nospec array_index_mask_nospec
+
+/**
  * read_barrier_depends - Flush all pending reads that subsequents reads
  * depend on.
  *

Reply via email to