* Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheu...@linaro.org> wrote: > On 12 March 2018 at 09:26, Ingo Molnar <mi...@kernel.org> wrote: > > > > * Ingo Molnar <mi...@kernel.org> wrote: > > > >> > -static pgd_t *efi_pgd; > >> > - > >> > >> Hm, so there's some interaction here with: > >> > >> 116fef640859: x86/mm/dump_pagetables: Add the EFI pagetable to the > >> debugfs 'page_tables' directory > >> > >> which is in tip:x86/mm. > >> > >> Could you please resolve that conflict? I'll sort out the topic branches > >> afterwards. > > > > So I've resolved it the following way, I merged the conflicting commit into > > tip:efi/core and applied the 3 unrelated patches from your series: > > > > 36b649760e94: efi: Use string literals for efi_char16_t variable > > initializers > > 136d5d57e35c: efi/esrt: Fix handling of early ESRT table mapping > > 7e904a91bf60: efi: Use efi_mm in x86 as well as ARM > > b0599e2801df: Merge branch 'x86/mm' into efi/core > > > > and pushed it out. > > > > So if you could resolve the two conflicting patches on top of 36b649760e94 > > then we > > should be good going forward. > > > > By 'resolve' you mean rebase and resend, right?
Yeah. I expected it to probably be a bit more work than a regular rebase, because we grew a new efi_pgd user and I didn't want to trivialize the conflict resolution effort - hence the 'resolve the conflict' formulation! :-) Thanks, Ingo