In -RT task_blocks_on_rt_mutex() may return with -EAGAIN due to
(->pi_blocked_on == PI_WAKEUP_INPROGRESS) before it added itself as a
waiter. In such a case we must not call remove_waiter() because without
a waiter it will trigger the BUG_ON() statement.

This was initially reported by Yimin Deng. Thomas Gleixner fixed it then
with an explicit check for waiters before calling remove_waiter() with
the following note:

| Guard it with rt_mutex_has_waiters(). This is a quick fix which is
| easy to backport. The proper fix is to have a central check in
| remove_waiter() so we can call it unconditionally.

This is the suggested change.
Now that it is possible to call remove_waiter() unconditionally I also
remove that check from rt_mutex_slowlock().

Link: 
https://lkml.kernel.org/r/CAAh1qt=dcl9auxnxanp5bktipp3m+qj4yb+gdohhxpvfcxw...@mail.gmail.com
Reported-and-debugged-by: Yimin Deng <yimin11.d...@gmail.com>
Suggested-by: Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bige...@linutronix.de>
---
 kernel/locking/rtmutex.c | 8 +++++---
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c b/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
index 65cc0cb984e6..57d28d8f5280 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
@@ -1068,12 +1068,15 @@ static void mark_wakeup_next_waiter(struct wake_q_head 
*wake_q,
 static void remove_waiter(struct rt_mutex *lock,
                          struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter)
 {
-       bool is_top_waiter = (waiter == rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock));
+       bool is_top_waiter = false;
        struct task_struct *owner = rt_mutex_owner(lock);
        struct rt_mutex *next_lock;
 
        lockdep_assert_held(&lock->wait_lock);
 
+       if (rt_mutex_has_waiters(lock))
+               is_top_waiter = waiter == rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock);
+
        raw_spin_lock(&current->pi_lock);
        rt_mutex_dequeue(lock, waiter);
        current->pi_blocked_on = NULL;
@@ -1268,8 +1271,7 @@ rt_mutex_slowlock(struct rt_mutex *lock, int state,
 
        if (unlikely(ret)) {
                __set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
-               if (rt_mutex_has_waiters(lock))
-                       remove_waiter(lock, &waiter);
+               remove_waiter(lock, &waiter);
                rt_mutex_handle_deadlock(ret, chwalk, &waiter);
        }
 
-- 
2.16.2

Reply via email to