On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 10:12:57PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 9:41 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 7:19 PM, Frederic Weisbecker > > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 10:53:25AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > >>> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]> > >>> > >>> Make cpuidle_idle_call() decide whether or not to stop the tick. > >>> > >>> First, the cpuidle_enter_s2idle() path deals with the tick (and with > >>> the entire timekeeping for that matter) by itself and it doesn't need > >>> the tick to be stopped beforehand. > >> > >> Not sure you meant timekeeping either :) > > > > Yeah, I meant nohz. > > Well, not really. :-) > > It is the entire timekeeping this time, as it can be suspended > entirely in that code path.
Fair point. Thanks!
