On 03/16/2018 01:06 PM, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> It does not revert cleanly so I reverted it manually. Patch doing that
>> is attached. Should we do this, or is there a better option?
> Please see:
> 859d880cf544 ("signal: Correct the offset of si_pkey in struct siginfo")
It would be really nice to actually cc the folks that wrote and maintain
the code when you both break their stuff and fix it. I don't see myself
or the x86 maintainers cc'd on any of this: the patch that caused the
breakage *or* the fix.
