On 22 March 2018 at 11:00, Viresh Kumar <[email protected]> wrote: > On 22-03-18, 10:31, Ulf Hansson wrote: >> Nitpick, perhaps change this to: >> >> if (gpd->set_performance_state) >> dev_pm_opp_of_remove_table(&gpd->dev); > > I probably did that to save the 80 column thing. So crossing 80 columns in > this > case is fine ?
If that is needed, then okay! Kind regards Uffe
