> But your patch doesn't actually do this, since gdb will just do > SETREGS anyway, right? GDB does SETREGS on any exclusive (FS/GS) updates in inferior call.
- Re: [PATCH 14/15] x86/fsgsbase/64: Support legacy behavi... Andy Lutomirski
- Re: [PATCH 14/15] x86/fsgsbase/64: Support legacy b... Bae, Chang Seok
- Re: [PATCH 14/15] x86/fsgsbase/64: Support lega... Andy Lutomirski
- RE: [PATCH 14/15] x86/fsgsbase/64: Support ... Metzger, Markus T
- Re: [PATCH 14/15] x86/fsgsbase/64: Supp... Andy Lutomirski
- Re: [PATCH 14/15] x86/fsgsbase/64: Support ... Bae, Chang Seok
- Re: [PATCH 14/15] x86/fsgsbase/64: Supp... Andy Lutomirski
- Re: [PATCH 14/15] x86/fsgsbase/64:... Bae, Chang Seok
- Re: [PATCH 14/15] x86/fsgsbase... Andy Lutomirski
- Re: [PATCH 14/15] x86/fsgs... Bae, Chang Seok
- Re: [PATCH 14/15] x86/fsgs... Andy Lutomirski
- RE: [PATCH 14/15] x86/fsgs... Bae, Chang Seok
- Re: [PATCH 14/15] x86/fsgs... Andy Lutomirski