On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 12:24 PM, Alan Cox <gno...@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> wrote: >> Sadly, this situation >> is not unique to this hardware. There is hardware all over that does >> not meet the current assumptions being made in the early uart drivers >> within the kernel. > > Is there any fundamental reason you can't just embed dt entries in the > ACPI table to describe the other features you need. I appreciate it > doesn't solve the generic PC case but it ought to help for anything where > the firmware cares about Linux ?
What's the method for doing that? Using _DSD methods? Or have a pointer to examples? Sorry, I haven't spelunked into the current state of bridging ACPI and devicetree in a while. -Aaron
