On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 8:59 PM, Stephen Boyd <[email protected]> wrote: > Quoting Andy Shevchenko (2018-03-21 10:59:10) >> On Wed, 2018-03-21 at 09:58 -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote: >> > From: Stephen Boyd <[email protected]> >> > >> > Some qcom platforms make some GPIOs or pins unavailable for use by >> > non-secure operating systems, and thus reading or writing the >> > registers >> > for those pins will cause access control issues. Add support for a DT >> > property to describe the set of GPIOs that are available for use so >> > that >> > higher level OSes are able to know what pins to avoid reading/writing. >> > Non-DT platforms can add support by directly updating the >> > chip->valid_mask. >> >> > Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <[email protected]> >> > Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <[email protected]> >> >> Hmm... > > Don't look closely! :P
Same physical person acting on behalf of two different legal entities right? Seems OK to me. Yours, Linus Walleij
