On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 09:06:37AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote: > So by no means the MM backports were reviewed by me. And considering how hard > it is to get any review for MM patches in general I strongly suspect that > others didn't review either. > > In general I am quite skeptical about the automagic backports > selections, to be honest. MM patches should be reasonably good at > selecting stable backports and adding more patches on top just risks > regressions.
BTW other than suggesting we needing *actual review* of the MM patches, are there known unit tests which could be run as well? Thinking long term. Luis
