Andy Lutomirski <l...@amacapital.net> wrote: > > Andy Lutomirski <l...@kernel.org> wrote: > > > >> As far as I can tell, what's really going on here is that there's a > >> significant contingent here that wants to prevent Linux from > >> chainloading something that isn't Linux. > > > > You have completely the wrong end of the stick. No one has said that or > > even implied that. You are alleging dishonesty on our part. > > I'm alleging that the idea that Linux seems some particular policy to > avoid being blacklisted keeps being brought up as a justification for > these patches.
No, you were alleging that "[we want] to prevent Linux from chainloading something that isn't Linux.". This is not true - at least, it's not true on my part; I cannot speak for what other people may think privately. David
