Andy Lutomirski <l...@amacapital.net> wrote:
> > Andy Lutomirski <l...@kernel.org> wrote:
> >> As far as I can tell, what's really going on here is that there's a
> >> significant contingent here that wants to prevent Linux from
> >> chainloading something that isn't Linux.
> > You have completely the wrong end of the stick. No one has said that or
> > even implied that. You are alleging dishonesty on our part.
> I'm alleging that the idea that Linux seems some particular policy to
> avoid being blacklisted keeps being brought up as a justification for
> these patches.
No, you were alleging that "[we want] to prevent Linux from chainloading
something that isn't Linux.".
This is not true - at least, it's not true on my part; I cannot speak for what
other people may think privately.