On Mon, Apr 02, 2018 at 09:49:54AM -0700, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> While running rt-tests' pi_stress program I got the following splat:
> 
>   444.884597] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> [  444.894784] rq->clock_update_flags < RQCF_ACT_SKIP
> [  444.894798] WARNING: CPU: 27 PID: 0 at kernel/sched/sched.h:960 
> assert_clock_updated.isra.38.part.39+0x13/0x20
> [  444.927419] Modules linked in: ...
> [  445.141336] CPU: 27 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/27 Kdump: loaded Tainted: G       
>      E     4.16.0-rc7-next-20180329-13.5-default+ #1
> [  445.168197] Hardware name: QCI QSSC-S4R/QSSC-S4R, BIOS 
> QSSC-S4R.QCI.01.00.S013.032920111005 03/29/2011
> [  445.188728] RIP: 0010:assert_clock_updated.isra.38.part.39+0x13/0x20
> [  445.202739] RSP: 0018:ffff9af37fb03e98 EFLAGS: 00010092
> [  445.214258] RAX: 0000000000000026 RBX: ffff9af37faa1bc0 RCX: 
> ffffffffbd064a68
> [  445.229994] RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 0000000000000092 RDI: 
> 0000000000000083
> [  445.245732] RBP: 0000000000000017 R08: 00000000000005f1 R09: 
> ffffffffbd864ca0
> [  445.261468] R10: 000000003cdf0977 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 
> ffff9af186178180
> [  445.277206] R13: ffffffffbd2396a0 R14: ffff9af37faa1bc0 R15: 
> 0000000000000017
> [  445.292944] FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff9af37fb00000(0000) 
> knlGS:0000000000000000
> [  445.310790] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
> [  445.323457] CR2: 0000556773e17968 CR3: 0000000b3d00a002 CR4: 
> 00000000000206e0
> [  445.339193] Call Trace:
> [  445.344578]  <IRQ>
> [  445.349001]  enqueue_top_rt_rq+0xf4/0x150
> [  445.357839]  ? cpufreq_dbs_governor_start+0x170/0x170
> [  445.368974]  sched_rt_rq_enqueue+0x65/0x80
> [  445.378000]  sched_rt_period_timer+0x156/0x360
> [  445.387792]  ? sched_rt_rq_enqueue+0x80/0x80
> [  445.397204]  __hrtimer_run_queues+0xfa/0x260
> [  445.406614]  hrtimer_interrupt+0xcb/0x220
> [  445.415451]  smp_apic_timer_interrupt+0x62/0x120
> [  445.425629]  apic_timer_interrupt+0xf/0x20
> [  445.434654]  </IRQ>
> [  445.439269] RIP: 0010:cpuidle_enter_state+0x9d/0x2b0
> [  445.450212] RSP: 0018:ffffac274642fec0 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 
> ffffffffffffff13
> [  445.466908] RAX: ffff9af37fb21bc0 RBX: 00000067952f9fb7 RCX: 
> 000000000000001f
> [  445.482645] RDX: 00000067952f9fb7 RSI: 00000000389cb571 RDI: 
> 0000000000000000
> [  445.498380] RBP: 0000000000000004 R08: 000000000000bc01 R09: 
> 000000000000c04c
> [  445.514116] R10: ffffac274642fea0 R11: 0000000000000eed R12: 
> ffffcc273fb10ff0
> [  445.529853] R13: ffffffffbd1813b8 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 
> 00000067923bdc5a
> [  445.545595]  do_idle+0x183/0x1e0
> [  445.552703]  cpu_startup_entry+0x5f/0x70
> [  445.561350]  start_secondary+0x192/0x1d0
> [  445.569995]  secondary_startup_64+0xa5/0xb0
> [  445.579212] Code: 00 48 0f a3 05 9f 85 17 01 0f 83 74 ff ff ff e9 d4 b6 fe 
> ff 0f 1f 40 00 48 c7 c7 f0 fd e6 bc c6 05 2e 08 14 01 01 e8 cd 2b fc ff <0f> 
> 0b c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 66 66 66 66 90 83 ea 08
> [  445.620864] ---[ end trace 0183b70f54a7f4ba ]---
> 
> We can get rid of it be the "traditional" means of adding an 
> update_rq_clock() call
> after acquiring the rq->lock in do_sched_rt_period_timer().
> 
> The case for the rt task throttling (which this workload also hits) can be 
> ignored in
> that the skip_update call is actually bogus and quite the contrary (the 
> request bits
> are removed/reverted). By setting RQCF_UPDATED we really don't care if the 
> skip is
> happening or not and will therefore make the assert_clock_updated() check 
> happy.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dbu...@suse.de>

Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <pet...@infradead.org>

Ingo, please merge.

> ---
>  kernel/sched/rt.c | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/rt.c b/kernel/sched/rt.c
> index 86b77987435e..ad13e6242481 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/rt.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/rt.c
> @@ -839,6 +839,8 @@ static int do_sched_rt_period_timer(struct rt_bandwidth 
> *rt_b, int overrun)
>                       continue;
>  
>               raw_spin_lock(&rq->lock);
> +             update_rq_clock(rq);
> +
>               if (rt_rq->rt_time) {
>                       u64 runtime;
>  
> -- 
> 2.13.6
> 

Reply via email to