On 04/04/2018 01:04 PM, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 04, 2018 at 12:24:33PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>>
>>> + pr_warn_once("Non PR_SET_MM_MAP operations are deprecated\n");
>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>> }
>>
>> I'm not against removing such functionality, but I think that it's more than
>> "deprecated." It's gone.
>
> At first this was plain warning without code removal but I've
> been advised that dropping it completely may be a better idea
> which I agree https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/4/4/31 Or you mean the
> warning message itsef? We aready have similars, for example
> in kernel/auditfilter.c
The traditional way (eons ago) to deprecate something was to add a
printk() and then delete the feature a few years later.
Still, I have no objection to dropping that prctl.
Sorry if I wasn't clear. I was objecting to the "language", i.e., to the
word "deprecated." Deprecated means frowned on, advised against, etc.
It does not mean "deleted."
> printk(KERN_ERR "AUDIT_POSSIBLE is deprecated\n");
Yeah, that one's wrong also. :)
--
~Randy
