On 05/04/18 09:19, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 8:34 AM, Greg KH <gre...@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
On Wed, Apr 04, 2018 at 07:02:01PM -0700, syzbot wrote:

syzbot hit the following crash on upstream commit
3e968c9f1401088abc9a19ae6ff571644d37a355 (Wed Apr 4 21:19:24 2018 +0000)
Merge tag 'ext4_for_linus' of
syzbot dashboard link:

C reproducer: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.c?id=5104666266304512
syzkaller reproducer:
Raw console output:
Kernel config:
compiler: gcc (GCC) 7.1.1 20170620

IMPORTANT: if you fix the bug, please add the following tag to the commit:
Reported-by: syzbot+ff87a28e665c163aa...@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
It will help syzbot understand when the bug is fixed. See footer for
If you forward the report, please keep this part and the footer.

R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000286 R12: 0000000000000003
R13: 0000000000000004 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000
------------[ cut here ]------------
kobject_add_internal failed for nodev( with -EEXIST, don't try to register
things with the same name in the same directory.
sysfs: cannot create duplicate filename '/fs/gfs2/nodev('
WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 4473 at lib/kobject.c:238
kobject_add_internal+0x8d4/0xbc0 lib/kobject.c:235
CPU: 0 PID: 4474 Comm: syzkaller533472 Not tainted 4.16.0+ #15
Kernel panic - not syncing: panic_on_warn set ...

Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS
Google 01/01/2011
Call Trace:
  __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:17 [inline]
  dump_stack+0x1a7/0x27d lib/dump_stack.c:53
  sysfs_warn_dup+0x83/0xa0 fs/sysfs/dir.c:30
  sysfs_create_dir_ns+0x178/0x1d0 fs/sysfs/dir.c:58
  create_dir lib/kobject.c:69 [inline]
  kobject_add_internal+0x335/0xbc0 lib/kobject.c:227
  kobject_add_varg lib/kobject.c:364 [inline]
  kobject_init_and_add+0xf9/0x150 lib/kobject.c:436
  gfs2_sys_fs_add+0x1ff/0x580 fs/gfs2/sys.c:652
  fill_super+0x86f/0x1d70 fs/gfs2/ops_fstype.c:1118
  gfs2_mount+0x587/0x6e0 fs/gfs2/ops_fstype.c:1321
gfs2 bug, not a sysfs bug, we are correctly warning about an incorrect
usage of the api.
Then +gfs2 maintainers.

Now if we should turn this into a non-WARN message, that's a different
thing, I'll gladly take a patch for that.
If it's API usage bug in higher level code, then I think WARN is a
proper thing. We already had similar ones and they were fixed.

I'm trying to figure out what the test is doing, but it is not very clear. At a guess I'd say that perhaps it is trying to mount multiple filesystems with the same label? If that is the case then it is not allowed, and it should be caught be the sysfs code and result in a refusal to mount, which is what I think I see here. Knowing which sysfs directory is involved would allow us to confirm, but I suspect that the test needs altering to give each gfs2 mount a different label at an initial guess,


Reply via email to