4.15-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------ From: Steffen Klassert <[email protected]> commit 19d7df69fdb2636856dc8919de72fc1bf8f79598 upstream. We don't have a compat layer for xfrm, so userspace and kernel structures have different sizes in this case. This results in a broken configuration, so refuse to configure socket policies when trying to insert from 32 bit userspace as we do it already with policies inserted via netlink. Reported-and-tested-by: [email protected] Signed-off-by: Steffen Klassert <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]> --- net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c | 5 +++++ 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) --- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c +++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c @@ -2056,6 +2056,11 @@ int xfrm_user_policy(struct sock *sk, in struct xfrm_mgr *km; struct xfrm_policy *pol = NULL; +#ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT + if (in_compat_syscall()) + return -EOPNOTSUPP; +#endif + if (!optval && !optlen) { xfrm_sk_policy_insert(sk, XFRM_POLICY_IN, NULL); xfrm_sk_policy_insert(sk, XFRM_POLICY_OUT, NULL);
