On Mon, Apr 09, 2018 at 01:26:23PM +0300, Sergey Suloev wrote: > On 04/09/2018 12:27 PM, Maxime Ripard wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 06, 2018 at 06:48:23PM +0300, Sergey Suloev wrote: > > > On 04/06/2018 10:34 AM, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > > According to what you said the driver must implement > > > "transfer_one_message" instead of "transfer_one" > > I'm not sure what makes you think that I said that. > Because current implementation tries to send more than FIFO-depth of data in > a single call to "transfer_one" which is wrong. No, that's absolutely not the case. All any of these functions has to do is transfer whatever they were asked to, how they do it is not at all important to the framework.
Description: PGP signature