* Yuval Shaia <yuval.sh...@oracle.com> wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Yuval Shaia <yuval.sh...@oracle.com>
> ---
> include/linux/kernel.h | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/kernel.h b/include/linux/kernel.h
> index ce51455e2adf..a5b4ba3bdb61 100644
> --- a/include/linux/kernel.h
> +++ b/include/linux/kernel.h
> @@ -651,7 +651,7 @@ do {
> \
> * your code. (Extra memory is used for special buffers that are
> * allocated when trace_printk() is used.)
> *
> - * A little optization trick is done here. If there's only one
> + * A little optimization trick is done here. If there's only one
> * argument, there's no need to scan the string for printf formats.
> * The trace_puts() will suffice. But how can we take advantage of
> * using trace_puts() when trace_printk() has only one argument?
Please also fix the typo in the title ;-)
Thanks,
Ingo
