Hi Rob, On 10 April 2018 07:24 Phil Edworthy wrote: > On 09 April 2018 20:20 Rob Herring wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 03:22:30PM +0100, Phil Edworthy wrote: [...] > > > +- interrupt-mask : a 32-bit bit mask that specifies which interrupts > > > +in the list > > > + of interrupts is valid, bit is 1 for a valid irq. > > > > This is not a standard property and would need a vendor prefix. However, > I'd > > prefer you just skip any not connected interrupts with an invalid interrupt > > number. Then the GPIO number is the index into "interrupts". > Makes sense, I'll rework it to do this. Err, what would an invalid interrupt number be? If I use -1, I get a DT parsing error and 0 is certainly valid. If the number is larger than the valid interrupt range I get errors during probe.