Hi Sergei, Niklas

On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 08:12:36PM +0300, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> On 04/10/2018 03:13 PM, jacopo mondi wrote:
> >>> From: Niklas Söderlund <niklas.soderlund+rene...@ragnatech.se>
> >>>
> >>> Add the LVDS device to r8a77970.dtsi in a disabled state. Also connect
> >>> the it to the LVDS output of the DU.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Niklas Söderlund <niklas.soderlund+rene...@ragnatech.se>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Jacopo Mondi <jacopo+rene...@jmondi.org>
> >>> Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinch...@ideasonboard.com>
> >>>
> >>> ---
> >>> v1 -> v2:
> >>> - Rebased on the modified endpoint name and changed patch subject to
> >>>   comply with other patches in the series from Sergei.
> >>
> >>    Stop, what was wrong with my R8A77970 LVDS patch, reposted on the 
> >> popular
> >> demand? :-)
> >>
> >
> > Nothing wrong, I found out about your right now.
> > I see a very small difference as
> >          lvds@feb90000 vs lvds-encoder@feb90000
>    Yes, I thought the latter was closer to a "generic" name that DT spec 
> requires...
> > You can add your signed-off-by ofc if you think that's the case.
>    Didn't understand what you mean here...

Don't worry, I will resend this and use (part of) your series
[PATCH v2 0/5] Add R8A77970/V3MSK LVDS/HDMI support

But please note that:
[1/5] from your series has already been collected by Simon
I have to reapply Laurent's comment on this series to your one (so I
have to resend it anyhow)
[5/5] from your series shall be resent to take into account the newly
developed LVDS decoder driver (once it has been accepted)

I have anyway to repost your patches then, and as I did in this series
you are ofc listed as author already, so I have missed what's the
difference actually except from LVDS patch I collected from Niklas and not
from your series.

Niklas I picked up patches 1-3 of this series from your tree.
1 and 2 are patches from Sergei's series
3 is from you but was also in Sergei's series and I picked yours as it
was there already. Can I rebase on top of Sergei's one instead?


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to