Han,

On 15.03.2018 16:39, Stefan Agner wrote:
> On March 15, 2018 4:36:20 PM GMT+01:00, Boris Brezillon
> <boris.brezil...@bootlin.com> wrote:
>>Hi,
>>
>>On Sun,  4 Mar 2018 21:06:01 +0100
>>Stefan Agner <ste...@agner.ch> wrote:
>>
>>> Add support for specified ECC strength/size using device tree
>>> properties nand-ecc-strength/nand-ecc-step-size.
>>
>>Han, we didn't hear back from you on that. Are you okay with adding
>>these new properties? IIRC, you feared there would be a delta between
>>u-boot and linux support.

Any comment on this?

U-Boot support for device tree support and the same properties is
underway.

--
Stefan


>>
>>Stephan, there's no changelog. Has anything changed in this version or
>>is this just a RESEND?
> 
> Sorry forgot that. I just split documentation and driver changes.
> 
> --
> Stefan
> 
>>
>>Regards,
>>
>>Boris
>>
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Stefan Agner <ste...@agner.ch>
>>> ---
>>>  drivers/mtd/nand/gpmi-nand/gpmi-nand.c | 30
>>++++++++++++++++++++----------
>>>  1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/gpmi-nand/gpmi-nand.c
>>b/drivers/mtd/nand/gpmi-nand/gpmi-nand.c
>>> index 61fdd733492f..d04754289c03 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/gpmi-nand/gpmi-nand.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/gpmi-nand/gpmi-nand.c
>>> @@ -198,17 +198,16 @@ static inline bool gpmi_check_ecc(struct
>>gpmi_nand_data *this)
>>>   *
>>>   * We may have available oob space in this case.
>>>   */
>>> -static int set_geometry_by_ecc_info(struct gpmi_nand_data *this)
>>> +static int set_geometry_by_ecc_info(struct gpmi_nand_data *this,
>>> +                               unsigned int ecc_strength,
>>> +                               unsigned int ecc_step)
>>>  {
>>>     struct bch_geometry *geo = &this->bch_geometry;
>>>     struct nand_chip *chip = &this->nand;
>>>     struct mtd_info *mtd = nand_to_mtd(chip);
>>>     unsigned int block_mark_bit_offset;
>>>
>>> -   if (!(chip->ecc_strength_ds > 0 && chip->ecc_step_ds > 0))
>>> -           return -EINVAL;
>>> -
>>> -   switch (chip->ecc_step_ds) {
>>> +   switch (ecc_step) {
>>>     case SZ_512:
>>>             geo->gf_len = 13;
>>>             break;
>>> @@ -221,8 +220,8 @@ static int set_geometry_by_ecc_info(struct
>>gpmi_nand_data *this)
>>>                     chip->ecc_strength_ds, chip->ecc_step_ds);
>>>             return -EINVAL;
>>>     }
>>> -   geo->ecc_chunk_size = chip->ecc_step_ds;
>>> -   geo->ecc_strength = round_up(chip->ecc_strength_ds, 2);
>>> +   geo->ecc_chunk_size = ecc_step;
>>> +   geo->ecc_strength = round_up(ecc_strength, 2);
>>>     if (!gpmi_check_ecc(this))
>>>             return -EINVAL;
>>>
>>> @@ -230,7 +229,7 @@ static int set_geometry_by_ecc_info(struct
>>gpmi_nand_data *this)
>>>     if (geo->ecc_chunk_size < mtd->oobsize) {
>>>             dev_err(this->dev,
>>>                     "unsupported nand chip. ecc size: %d, oob size : %d\n",
>>> -                   chip->ecc_step_ds, mtd->oobsize);
>>> +                   ecc_step, mtd->oobsize);
>>>             return -EINVAL;
>>>     }
>>>
>>> @@ -423,9 +422,20 @@ static int legacy_set_geometry(struct
>>gpmi_nand_data *this)
>>>
>>>  int common_nfc_set_geometry(struct gpmi_nand_data *this)
>>>  {
>>> +   struct nand_chip *chip = &this->nand;
>>> +
>>> +   if (chip->ecc.strength > 0 && chip->ecc.size > 0)
>>> +           return set_geometry_by_ecc_info(this, chip->ecc.strength,
>>> +                                           chip->ecc.size);
>>> +
>>>     if ((of_property_read_bool(this->dev->of_node,
>>"fsl,use-minimum-ecc"))
>>> -                           || legacy_set_geometry(this))
>>> -           return set_geometry_by_ecc_info(this);
>>> +                           || legacy_set_geometry(this)) {
>>> +           if (!(chip->ecc_strength_ds > 0 && chip->ecc_step_ds > 0))
>>> +                   return -EINVAL;
>>> +
>>> +           return set_geometry_by_ecc_info(this, chip->ecc_strength_ds,
>>> +                                           chip->ecc_step_ds);
>>> +   }
>>>
>>>     return 0;
>>>  }

Reply via email to