On Mon, Apr 09, 2018 at 05:56:09PM +0100, Patrick Bellasi wrote:
> +static inline void uclamp_cpu_get(struct task_struct *p, int cpu, int 
> clamp_id)
> +{
> +     struct uclamp_cpu *uc_cpu = &cpu_rq(cpu)->uclamp[clamp_id];

> +static inline void uclamp_cpu_put(struct task_struct *p, int cpu, int 
> clamp_id)
> +{
> +     struct uclamp_cpu *uc_cpu = &cpu_rq(cpu)->uclamp[clamp_id];

That all seems daft, since you already have rq at the call site.

> +static inline void uclamp_task_update(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
> +{
> +     int cpu = cpu_of(rq);
> +     int clamp_id;
> +
> +     /* The idle task does not affect CPU's clamps */
> +     if (unlikely(p->sched_class == &idle_sched_class))
> +             return;
> +     /* DEADLINE tasks do not affect CPU's clamps */
> +     if (unlikely(p->sched_class == &dl_sched_class))
> +             return;

This is wrong; it misses the stop_sched_class.

And since you're looking at sched_class anyway, maybe put a marker in
there:

        if (!p->sched_class->has_clamping)
                return;

> +     for (clamp_id = 0; clamp_id < UCLAMP_CNT; ++clamp_id) {
> +             if (uclamp_task_affects(p, clamp_id))
> +                     uclamp_cpu_put(p, cpu, clamp_id);
> +             else
> +                     uclamp_cpu_get(p, cpu, clamp_id);
> +     }
> +}

Reply via email to