On Fri, 13 Apr 2018, Thomas Huth <th...@redhat.com> wrote:
> Selecting CONFIG_HDMI for S390 is inappropriate - there is no real
> graphic hardware on this architecture. The drm subsystem is only
> enabled here for using the virtual graphics card "virtio-gpu". So
> it should be possible to compile the drm subsystem also without
> CONFIG_I2C. Tweak the Makefile to only compile the affected files
> with CONFIG_I2C=y and disable some I2C-related code in drm_edid.c.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <th...@redhat.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/Kconfig    |  4 ++--
>  drivers/gpu/drm/Makefile   | 16 +++++++++-------
>  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c | 10 +++++++---
>  3 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/Kconfig b/drivers/gpu/drm/Kconfig
> index 298a518..c9df67f 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/Kconfig
> @@ -10,8 +10,8 @@ menuconfig DRM
>       select DRM_PANEL_ORIENTATION_QUIRKS
>       select HDMI if !S390
>       select FB_CMDLINE
> -     select I2C
> -     select I2C_ALGOBIT
> +     select I2C if !S390
> +     select I2C_ALGOBIT if !S390
>       select DMA_SHARED_BUFFER
>       select SYNC_FILE
>       help
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/Makefile b/drivers/gpu/drm/Makefile
> index 16fd8e3..4cf53ba 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/Makefile
> @@ -7,10 +7,9 @@ drm-y       :=       drm_auth.o drm_bufs.o drm_cache.o \
>               drm_context.o drm_dma.o \
>               drm_file.o drm_gem.o drm_ioctl.o drm_irq.o \
>               drm_lock.o drm_memory.o drm_drv.o \
> -             drm_scatter.o drm_pci.o \
> +             drm_scatter.o drm_pci.o drm_info.o \
>               drm_sysfs.o drm_hashtab.o drm_mm.o \
>               drm_crtc.o drm_fourcc.o drm_modes.o drm_edid.o \
> -             drm_info.o drm_encoder_slave.o \
>               drm_trace_points.o drm_global.o drm_prime.o \
>               drm_rect.o drm_vma_manager.o drm_flip_work.o \
>               drm_modeset_lock.o drm_atomic.o drm_bridge.o \
> @@ -20,6 +19,7 @@ drm-y       :=      drm_auth.o drm_bufs.o drm_cache.o \
>               drm_dumb_buffers.o drm_mode_config.o drm_vblank.o \
>               drm_syncobj.o drm_lease.o
>  
> +drm-$(CONFIG_I2C) += drm_encoder_slave.o
>  drm-$(CONFIG_HDMI) += drm_hdmi.o
>  drm-$(CONFIG_DRM_LIB_RANDOM) += lib/drm_random.o
>  drm-$(CONFIG_DRM_VM) += drm_vm.o
> @@ -32,11 +32,13 @@ drm-$(CONFIG_AGP) += drm_agpsupport.o
>  drm-$(CONFIG_DEBUG_FS) += drm_debugfs.o drm_debugfs_crc.o
>  drm-$(CONFIG_DRM_LOAD_EDID_FIRMWARE) += drm_edid_load.o
>  
> -drm_kms_helper-y := drm_crtc_helper.o drm_dp_helper.o drm_probe_helper.o \
> -             drm_plane_helper.o drm_dp_mst_topology.o drm_atomic_helper.o \
> -             drm_kms_helper_common.o drm_dp_dual_mode_helper.o \
> -             drm_simple_kms_helper.o drm_modeset_helper.o \
> -             drm_scdc_helper.o drm_gem_framebuffer_helper.o
> +drm_kms_helper-y := drm_crtc_helper.o drm_probe_helper.o \
> +             drm_plane_helper.o drm_atomic_helper.o \
> +             drm_gem_framebuffer_helper.o drm_kms_helper_common.o \
> +             drm_simple_kms_helper.o drm_modeset_helper.o
> +
> +drm_kms_helper-$(CONFIG_I2C) += drm_dp_helper.o drm_dp_mst_topology.o \
> +             drm_dp_dual_mode_helper.o drm_scdc_helper.o
>  
>  drm_kms_helper-$(CONFIG_DRM_PANEL_BRIDGE) += bridge/panel.o
>  drm_kms_helper-$(CONFIG_DRM_FBDEV_EMULATION) += drm_fb_helper.o
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c
> index 3820763..0d0d5af 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c
> @@ -1467,11 +1467,14 @@ bool drm_edid_is_valid(struct edid *edid)
>  static int
>  drm_do_probe_ddc_edid(void *data, u8 *buf, unsigned int block, size_t len)
>  {
> -     struct i2c_adapter *adapter = data;
> -     unsigned char start = block * EDID_LENGTH;
>       unsigned char segment = block >> 1;
>       unsigned char xfers = segment ? 3 : 2;
> -     int ret, retries = 5;
> +     int ret = -1;
> +
> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_I2C)

So I don't know if the patches are worth it, I'll let others decide, but
no matter what the conditional build needs to be *outside* of function
bodies. The #else branch would then contain just:

#else
static inline int
drm_do_probe_ddc_edid(void *data, u8 *buf, unsigned int block, size_t len)
{
        return -1;
}
#endif /* CONFIG_I2C */


BR,
Jani.

> +     struct i2c_adapter *adapter = data;
> +     unsigned char start = block * EDID_LENGTH;
> +     int retries = 5;
>  
>       /*
>        * The core I2C driver will automatically retry the transfer if the
> @@ -1512,6 +1515,7 @@ bool drm_edid_is_valid(struct edid *edid)
>                       break;
>               }
>       } while (ret != xfers && --retries);
> +#endif       /* CONFIG_I2C */
>  
>       return ret == xfers ? 0 : -1;
>  }

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center

Reply via email to