On Monday, April 16, 2018 02:16:56 PM Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 16/04/2018 12:11, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> > From: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprow...@samsung.com>
> > 
> > tmu_read() in case of Exynos4210 might return error for out of bound
> > values. Current code ignores such value, what leads to reporting critical
> > temperature value. Add proper error code propagation to exynos_get_temp()
> > function.
> 
> For me the comment in the function exynos4210_tmu_read
> 
> /* "temp_code" should range between 75 and 175 */
> 
> ... is strange. I would double check this assertion before dealing with
> the error value.

static int exynos4210_tmu_read(struct exynos_tmu_data *data)
{
        int ret = readb(data->base + EXYNOS_TMU_REG_CURRENT_TEMP);

        /* "temp_code" should range between 75 and 175 */
        return (ret < 75 || ret > 175) ? -ENODATA : ret;
}

The value returned by Exynos4210 hardware should be > 75 && < 175 and
it is later used as the "temp_code" parameter for code_to_temp():

static int code_to_temp(struct exynos_tmu_data *data, u16 temp_code)
{
        if (data->cal_type == TYPE_ONE_POINT_TRIMMING)
                return temp_code - data->temp_error1 + EXYNOS_FIRST_POINT_TRIM;

        return (temp_code - data->temp_error1) *
                (EXYNOS_SECOND_POINT_TRIM - EXYNOS_FIRST_POINT_TRIM) /
                (data->temp_error2 - data->temp_error1) +
                EXYNOS_FIRST_POINT_TRIM;
}

so after the current fix the code finally matches the comment.

> > Signed-off-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprow...@samsung.com>
> > CC: sta...@vger.kernel.org # v4.6+
> > Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnier...@samsung.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c | 9 +++++++--
> >  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c 
> > b/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c
> > index 986cbd0..ac83f72 100644
> > --- a/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c
> > +++ b/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c
> > @@ -892,6 +892,7 @@ static void exynos7_tmu_control(struct platform_device 
> > *pdev, bool on)
> >  static int exynos_get_temp(void *p, int *temp)
> >  {
> >     struct exynos_tmu_data *data = p;
> > +   int value, ret = 0;
> >  
> >     if (!data || !data->tmu_read || !data->enabled)
> >             return -EINVAL;
> > @@ -899,12 +900,16 @@ static int exynos_get_temp(void *p, int *temp)
> >     mutex_lock(&data->lock);
> >     clk_enable(data->clk);
> >  
> > -   *temp = code_to_temp(data, data->tmu_read(data)) * MCELSIUS;
> > +   value = data->tmu_read(data);
> > +   if (value < 0)
> > +           ret = value;
> > +   else
> > +           *temp = code_to_temp(data, value) * MCELSIUS;
> >  
> >     clk_disable(data->clk);
> >     mutex_unlock(&data->lock);
> >  
> > -   return 0;
> > +   return ret;
> >  }
> >  
> >  #ifdef CONFIG_THERMAL_EMULATION

Best regards,
--
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
Samsung R&D Institute Poland
Samsung Electronics

Reply via email to