On Mon, 16 Apr 2018 16:02:03 +0000 Sasha Levin <[email protected]> wrote:
> One of the things Greg is pushing strongly for is "bug compatibility": > we want the kernel to behave the same way between mainline and stable. > If the code is broken, it should be broken in the same way. Wait! What does that mean? What's the purpose of stable if it is as broken as mainline? -- Steve
