4.16-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Dexuan Cui <de...@microsoft.com>

commit 021ad274d7dc31611d4f47f7dd4ac7a224526f30 upstream.

When we hot-remove the device, we first receive a PCI_EJECT message and
then receive a PCI_BUS_RELATIONS message with bus_rel->device_count == 0.

The first message is offloaded to hv_eject_device_work(), and the second
is offloaded to pci_devices_present_work(). Both the paths can be running
list_del(&hpdev->list_entry), causing general protection fault, because
system_wq can run them concurrently.

The patch eliminates the race condition.

Since access to present/eject work items is serialized, we do not need the
hbus->enum_sem anymore, so remove it.

Fixes: 4daace0d8ce8 ("PCI: hv: Add paravirtual PCI front-end for Microsoft 
Hyper-V VMs")
Link: 
https://lkml.kernel.org/r/kl1p15301mb00064da6b4d221123b5241cfbf...@kl1p15301mb0006.apcp153.prod.outlook.com
Tested-by: Adrian Suhov <v-ads...@microsoft.com>
Tested-by: Chris Valean <v-chv...@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Dexuan Cui <de...@microsoft.com>
[lorenzo.pieral...@arm.com: squashed semaphore removal patch]
Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieral...@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Kelley <mikel...@microsoft.com>
Acked-by: Haiyang Zhang <haiya...@microsoft.com>
Cc: <sta...@vger.kernel.org> # v4.6+
Cc: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuzn...@redhat.com>
Cc: Jack Morgenstein <ja...@mellanox.com>
Cc: Stephen Hemminger <sthem...@microsoft.com>
Cc: K. Y. Srinivasan <k...@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>

---
 drivers/pci/host/pci-hyperv.c |   34 ++++++++++++++++------------------
 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/pci/host/pci-hyperv.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/host/pci-hyperv.c
@@ -447,7 +447,6 @@ struct hv_pcibus_device {
        spinlock_t device_list_lock;    /* Protect lists below */
        void __iomem *cfg_addr;
 
-       struct semaphore enum_sem;
        struct list_head resources_for_children;
 
        struct list_head children;
@@ -461,6 +460,8 @@ struct hv_pcibus_device {
        struct retarget_msi_interrupt retarget_msi_interrupt_params;
 
        spinlock_t retarget_msi_interrupt_lock;
+
+       struct workqueue_struct *wq;
 };
 
 /*
@@ -1590,12 +1591,8 @@ static struct hv_pci_dev *get_pcichild_w
  * It must also treat the omission of a previously observed device as
  * notification that the device no longer exists.
  *
- * Note that this function is a work item, and it may not be
- * invoked in the order that it was queued.  Back to back
- * updates of the list of present devices may involve queuing
- * multiple work items, and this one may run before ones that
- * were sent later. As such, this function only does something
- * if is the last one in the queue.
+ * Note that this function is serialized with hv_eject_device_work(),
+ * because both are pushed to the ordered workqueue hbus->wq.
  */
 static void pci_devices_present_work(struct work_struct *work)
 {
@@ -1616,11 +1613,6 @@ static void pci_devices_present_work(str
 
        INIT_LIST_HEAD(&removed);
 
-       if (down_interruptible(&hbus->enum_sem)) {
-               put_hvpcibus(hbus);
-               return;
-       }
-
        /* Pull this off the queue and process it if it was the last one. */
        spin_lock_irqsave(&hbus->device_list_lock, flags);
        while (!list_empty(&hbus->dr_list)) {
@@ -1637,7 +1629,6 @@ static void pci_devices_present_work(str
        spin_unlock_irqrestore(&hbus->device_list_lock, flags);
 
        if (!dr) {
-               up(&hbus->enum_sem);
                put_hvpcibus(hbus);
                return;
        }
@@ -1724,7 +1715,6 @@ static void pci_devices_present_work(str
                break;
        }
 
-       up(&hbus->enum_sem);
        put_hvpcibus(hbus);
        kfree(dr);
 }
@@ -1770,7 +1760,7 @@ static void hv_pci_devices_present(struc
        spin_unlock_irqrestore(&hbus->device_list_lock, flags);
 
        get_hvpcibus(hbus);
-       schedule_work(&dr_wrk->wrk);
+       queue_work(hbus->wq, &dr_wrk->wrk);
 }
 
 /**
@@ -1848,7 +1838,7 @@ static void hv_pci_eject_device(struct h
        get_pcichild(hpdev, hv_pcidev_ref_pnp);
        INIT_WORK(&hpdev->wrk, hv_eject_device_work);
        get_hvpcibus(hpdev->hbus);
-       schedule_work(&hpdev->wrk);
+       queue_work(hpdev->hbus->wq, &hpdev->wrk);
 }
 
 /**
@@ -2461,13 +2451,18 @@ static int hv_pci_probe(struct hv_device
        spin_lock_init(&hbus->config_lock);
        spin_lock_init(&hbus->device_list_lock);
        spin_lock_init(&hbus->retarget_msi_interrupt_lock);
-       sema_init(&hbus->enum_sem, 1);
        init_completion(&hbus->remove_event);
+       hbus->wq = alloc_ordered_workqueue("hv_pci_%x", 0,
+                                          hbus->sysdata.domain);
+       if (!hbus->wq) {
+               ret = -ENOMEM;
+               goto free_bus;
+       }
 
        ret = vmbus_open(hdev->channel, pci_ring_size, pci_ring_size, NULL, 0,
                         hv_pci_onchannelcallback, hbus);
        if (ret)
-               goto free_bus;
+               goto destroy_wq;
 
        hv_set_drvdata(hdev, hbus);
 
@@ -2536,6 +2531,8 @@ free_config:
        hv_free_config_window(hbus);
 close:
        vmbus_close(hdev->channel);
+destroy_wq:
+       destroy_workqueue(hbus->wq);
 free_bus:
        free_page((unsigned long)hbus);
        return ret;
@@ -2615,6 +2612,7 @@ static int hv_pci_remove(struct hv_devic
        irq_domain_free_fwnode(hbus->sysdata.fwnode);
        put_hvpcibus(hbus);
        wait_for_completion(&hbus->remove_event);
+       destroy_workqueue(hbus->wq);
        free_page((unsigned long)hbus);
        return 0;
 }


Reply via email to