On Thu, 7 Jun 2007, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Thursday 07 June 2007, Davide Libenzi wrote: > > The sys_socketcall() system call has been also changed to support > > a new SYS_SOCKET2 indentifier. > > I thought the general agreement was that sys_socketcall is a bad > idea to start with. Is there any benefit in adding new calls to > it instead of using a new system call number for sys_socket2 on > all architectures?
Ohh, I didn't know it was flagged as "bad" ;) I actually had it that way, but then I noticed there was no __NR_socket, so I complied to the existing way of doing it. - Davide - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
