From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <[email protected]>
Since e145242ea0df ("syscalls/core, syscalls/x86: Clean up syscall stub
naming convention") changed the main syscall function for 'epoll_pwait'
to something other than the expected 'SyS_epoll_pwait the' 'perf test
BPF' entries started failing, fix it by using something called from the
main syscall function instead, 'epoll_wait', which should keep this test
working in older kernels too.
Before:
# perf test BPF
40: BPF filter :
40.1: Basic BPF filtering : FAILED!
40.2: BPF pinning : Skip
40.3: BPF prologue generation : Skip
40.4: BPF relocation checker : Skip
If we use -v for that test we see the problem:
Probe point 'SyS_epoll_pwait' not found.
After:
# perf test BPF
40: BPF filter :
40.1: Basic BPF filtering : Ok
40.2: BPF pinning : Ok
40.3: BPF prologue generation : Ok
40.4: BPF relocation checker : Ok
#
Cc: Adrian Hunter <[email protected]>
Cc: David Ahern <[email protected]>
Cc: Dominik Brodowski <[email protected]>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <[email protected]>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]>
Cc: Wang Nan <[email protected]>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <[email protected]>
---
tools/perf/tests/bpf-script-example.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/bpf-script-example.c
b/tools/perf/tests/bpf-script-example.c
index e4123c1b0e88..1ca5106df5f1 100644
--- a/tools/perf/tests/bpf-script-example.c
+++ b/tools/perf/tests/bpf-script-example.c
@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ struct bpf_map_def SEC("maps") flip_table = {
.max_entries = 1,
};
-SEC("func=SyS_epoll_pwait")
+SEC("func=do_epoll_wait")
int bpf_func__SyS_epoll_pwait(void *ctx)
{
int ind =0;
--
2.14.3
