On Thu, 7 June 2007 15:59:00 -0700, Jared Hulbert wrote: > > Gee I think it seems logfs would be a better choice. Jffs2 and > ubifs(jffs3) for that matter combine node and node header in series > which means your data nodes aren't aligned to page boundarys. Logfs > nodes could be more easily aligned.
That used to be the case before I did a format change. Compression pretty much requires a format very similar to JFFS2. The alternative would be _huge_ complexity. However, it would be possible to create specialized XIP segments with the old page-aligned format. Supporting two kinds of segment format is still simpler than supporting compression with the old format. Jörn -- With a PC, I always felt limited by the software available. On Unix, I am limited only by my knowledge. -- Peter J. Schoenster - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
