On 30/04/18 14:19, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> Hi Colin,
>
> On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 02:14:20PM +0100, Colin King wrote:
>> From: Colin Ian King <[email protected]>
>>
>> There is a missing break in case PIN_CONFIG_DRIVE_STRENGTH leading to
>> a fall-through to the PIN_CONFIG_SLEW_RATE case that performs different
>> checks against *arg. This looks like an unintentional missing break so
>> add in the break.
>>
>
> Yes, break has been left out by mistake. Thanks for fixing!
I've noticed another missing break, I'll send a V2.
Colin
>
>> Detected by CoverityScan, CID#1468459 ("Missing break in switch")
>>
>> Fixes: 513d7a2f7e0f ("pinctrl: actions: Add Actions S900 pinctrl driver")
>> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <[email protected]>
>
> Acked-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <[email protected]>
>
> Thanks,
> Mani
>
>> ---
>> drivers/pinctrl/actions/pinctrl-owl.c | 1 +
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/actions/pinctrl-owl.c
>> b/drivers/pinctrl/actions/pinctrl-owl.c
>> index 928b40f71a3c..d15abb97821e 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/actions/pinctrl-owl.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/actions/pinctrl-owl.c
>> @@ -441,6 +441,7 @@ static int owl_group_pinconf_val2arg(const struct
>> owl_pingroup *g,
>> default:
>> return -EINVAL;
>> }
>> + break;
>> case PIN_CONFIG_SLEW_RATE:
>> if (*arg)
>> *arg = 1;
>> --
>> 2.17.0
>>
