Hello Stephen,

Thanks for the review comments.

On 4/27/2018 5:10 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
Quoting Taniya Das (2018-04-24 05:23:19)
diff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpmh.c b/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpmh.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..907a73f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpmh.c
@@ -0,0 +1,364 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/*
+ * Copyright (c) 2018, The Linux Foundation. All rights reserved.
+ */
+
+#include <linux/clk-provider.h>
+#include <linux/err.h>
+#include <linux/kernel.h>
+#include <linux/module.h>
+#include <linux/of.h>
+#include <linux/of_device.h>
+#include <linux/platform_device.h>
+#include <soc/qcom/cmd-db.h>
+#include <soc/qcom/rpmh.h>
+
+#include <dt-bindings/clock/qcom,rpmh.h>
+
+#define CLK_RPMH_ARC_EN_OFFSET         0
+#define CLK_RPMH_VRM_EN_OFFSET         4
+
+/**
+ * struct clk_rpmh - individual rpmh clock data structure
+ * @hw:                        handle between common and hardware-specific 
interfaces
+ * @res_name:          resource name for the rpmh clock
+ * @res_addr:          base address of the rpmh resource within the RPMh
+ * @res_en_offset:     clock resource enable offset corresponding to ARC or
+ *                     VRM type clock

Can these be combined still? Just do a += on res_addr after we get the
base of it?

I have taken care in the next patch.

+ * @res_on_val:                rpmh clock enable value
+ * @res_off_val:       rpmh clock disable value
+ * @state:             rpmh clock requested state
+ * @aggr_state:                rpmh clock aggregated state
+ * @last_sent_aggr_state: rpmh clock last aggr state sent to RPMh
+ * @valid_state_mask:  mask to determine the state of the rpmh clock
+ * @rpmh_client:       handle used for rpmh communications
+ * @dev:               device to which it is attached
+ * @peer:              pointer to the clock rpmh sibling
+ * @rate:              rate of the rpmh clock
+ */
+struct clk_rpmh {
+       struct clk_hw hw;
+       const char *res_name;
+       u32 res_addr;
+       u32 res_en_offset;
+       u32 res_on_val;
+       u32 res_off_val;
+       u32 state;
+       u32 aggr_state;
+       u32 last_sent_aggr_state;
+       u32 valid_state_mask;
+       struct rpmh_client *rpmh_client;
+       struct device *dev;
+       struct clk_rpmh *peer;
+       unsigned long rate;
+};
[...]
+
+static inline bool has_state_changed(struct clk_rpmh *c, u32 state)
+{
+       return (c->last_sent_aggr_state & BIT(state))
+               != (c->aggr_state & BIT(state));

Please drop useless parenthesis.


I see a warning in case I remove the parenthesis.

warning: suggest parentheses around comparison in operand of ‘&’ [-Wparentheses]
   != c->aggr_state & BIT(state));

+}
+
+static int clk_rpmh_send_aggregate_command(struct clk_rpmh *c)
+{
+       struct tcs_cmd cmd = { 0 };
+       u32 cmd_state, on_val;
+       enum rpmh_state state = RPMH_SLEEP_STATE;
+       int ret;
+
+       cmd.addr = c->res_addr + c->res_en_offset;
+       cmd_state = c->aggr_state;
+       on_val = c->res_on_val;
+
+       for (; state <= RPMH_ACTIVE_ONLY_STATE; state++) {
+               if (has_state_changed(c, state)) {
+                       cmd.data = (cmd_state & BIT(state)) ? on_val : 0;
+                       ret = rpmh_write_async(c->rpmh_client, state,
+                                               &cmd, 1);
+                       if (ret) {
+                               dev_err(c->dev, "set %s state of %s failed: 
(%d)\n",
+                                       (!state) ? "sleep" :

Drop parenthesis please.


Dropped.

+                                       (state == RPMH_WAKE_ONLY_STATE) ?

Drop parenthesis please.


Dropped.

+                                       "wake" : "active", c->res_name, ret);
+                               return ret;
+                       }
+               }
+       }
+
+       c->last_sent_aggr_state = c->aggr_state;
+       c->peer->last_sent_aggr_state =  c->last_sent_aggr_state;
+
+       return 0;
+}
[...]
+
+static const struct clk_ops clk_rpmh_ops = {
+       .prepare        = clk_rpmh_prepare,
+       .unprepare      = clk_rpmh_unprepare,
+       .recalc_rate    = clk_rpmh_recalc_rate,
+};
+
+/* Resource name must match resource id present in cmd-db. */
+DEFINE_CLK_RPMH_ARC(sdm845, bi_tcxo, bi_tcxo_ao, "xo.lvl", 0x3, 0x0, 19200000);
+DEFINE_CLK_RPMH_VRM(sdm845, ln_bb_clk2, ln_bb_clk2_ao, "lnbclka2", 19200000);
+DEFINE_CLK_RPMH_VRM(sdm845, ln_bb_clk3, ln_bb_clk3_ao, "lnbclka3", 19200000);
+DEFINE_CLK_RPMH_VRM(sdm845, rf_clk1, rf_clk1_ao, "rfclka1", 38400000);
+DEFINE_CLK_RPMH_VRM(sdm845, rf_clk2, rf_clk2_ao, "rfclka2", 38400000);
+DEFINE_CLK_RPMH_VRM(sdm845, rf_clk3, rf_clk3_ao, "rfclka3", 38400000);

These rates should come from DT and parents of these clks.


Removed the rates from the above and instead I would take the clk-div values from the DT for the clocks and compute the rates and parents are fixed to "xo_board".

--
QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member
of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation.

--

Reply via email to