On Sun, 2007-06-10 at 19:43 +1000, Nigel Cunningham wrote: > Hi Thomas. > > On Sun, 2007-06-10 at 09:44 +0000, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > plain text document attachment (clockevents-fix-resume-logic.patch) > > We need to make sure, that the clockevent devices are resumed, before > > the tick is resumed. The current resume logic does not guarantee this. > > > > Add CLOCK_EVT_MODE_RESUME and call the set mode functions of the clock > > event devices before resuming the tick / oneshot functionality. > > > > Fixup the existing users. > > What are the implications of the issue for current (i386) users? (Could > suspend/hibernation be broken in any way without this patch?)
I have one box, which needs this patch. OTOH it breaks Andrew's jinxed VAIO in a very mysterious way: http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/6/9/158 tglx - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
