do {
-                       tpm_msleep(TPM_POLL_SLEEP);
+                       tpm_msleep(TPM_TIMEOUT_POLL);

I'm just curious why it was decided to still use tpm_msleep() here instead of usleep_range() which was used in the 2nd patch.

Otherwise,

Acked-by: Jay Freyensee <why2jjj.li...@gmail.com>

Reply via email to