On Sun, May 13, 2018 at 08:15:36PM -0700, Joel Fernandes (Google) wrote:
> Commit be4b8beed87d ("rcu: Move RCU's grace-period-change code to ->gp_seq")
> removed the cpuend grace period trace point. This patch adds it back.
>
> Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <[email protected]>
Good catch!!! I queued this to be squashed into the offending commit,
with attribution.
Thanx, Paul
> ---
> kernel/rcu/tree.c | 6 ++++--
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> index 9ad931bff409..29ccc60bdbfc 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> @@ -1774,10 +1774,12 @@ static bool __note_gp_changes(struct rcu_state *rsp,
> struct rcu_node *rnp,
>
> /* Handle the ends of any preceding grace periods first. */
> if (rcu_seq_completed_gp(rdp->gp_seq, rnp->gp_seq) ||
> - unlikely(READ_ONCE(rdp->gpwrap)))
> + unlikely(READ_ONCE(rdp->gpwrap))) {
> ret = rcu_advance_cbs(rsp, rnp, rdp); /* Advance callbacks. */
> - else
> + trace_rcu_grace_period(rsp->name, rdp->gp_seq, TPS("cpuend"));
> + } else {
> ret = rcu_accelerate_cbs(rsp, rnp, rdp); /* Recent callbacks. */
> + }
>
> /* Now handle the beginnings of any new-to-this-CPU grace periods. */
> if (rcu_seq_new_gp(rdp->gp_seq, rnp->gp_seq) ||
> --
> 2.17.0.441.gb46fe60e1d-goog
>
