On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 12:55:00PM +0200, Håkon Bugge wrote: > > I'll check upstream OpenSM when I get a chance to see if same problem > > exists. Oracle OpenSM forked from upstream long time ago and not sure > > how similar the path record code is. There were various impacts for the > > shared port virtualization (for CX-3) in terms of adding the ability to > > allow both pkeys. > > I just had a chat with Line H. here in Oracle. She confirms that Oracle’s SM > and the upstream one act similar in this matter. > > Further, using shared port virtualization, OpenSM will adhere to the > physical ports only, and doesn’t even know the PKey assignments to > the VFs assigned the VMs.
Yes, but that isn't the point. If the VM receives a PR with a pkey that is not found in the VM's table then it should not even send a CM REQ in the first place. Jason
