* Masami Hiramatsu <mhira...@kernel.org> wrote: > Ignore break_handler related code because it was only > used by jprobe and jprobe is removed.
I changed this description to: ============ Subject: kprobes: Don't call the ->break_handler() in generic kprobes code Don't call the ->break_handler() from the core kprobes code, because it was only used by jprobes which got removed. ( In a followup patch we'll remove the remaining calls in low level arch handlers as well and remove the callback altogether. ) ============ Please try to be a lot less vague in changelogs when it's possible and relevant! I.e. saying "Ignore break_handler related code" is annoyingly vague, it doesn't explain things well at all. Saying "Don't call the ->break_handler()" is just as compact, yet it also makes it very clear what's done in the patch... Thanks, Ingo