Borislav Petkov <b...@alien8.de> wrote: > On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 02:36:21PM +0000, Nadav Amit wrote: >> I didn’t try too hard to find more affected (micro)benchmarks, but I am >> pretty sure there are: > > So you being pretty sure there are, doesn't make me go, oh, ok, then, > this is an uglification we should try to live with. It is still ugly > with no proven benefit from it.
In case you didn’t read the cover-letter: the patch-set does give a 2% performance improvement for #PF-MADV_DONTNEED microbenchmark loop.
