Hello Rob, Viresh,
Thank you for the comments. If I understand correctly, the device tree
nodes should look something like the below.
Though I am not sure if any vendor name could be associated in the cpu
nodes.
Please suggest if my understanding is wrong.
cpu@0 {
qcom,freq-domain = <&freq_domain_table0>;
…
};
same follows for cpu 1/2/3
cpu@400 {
qcom,freq-domain = <&freq_domain_table1>;
…
};
same follows for cpu 5/6/7
freq_domain_table0 : freq_table {
reg = < >, < >, < > ;
reg-names = "perf_base", "lut_base", "en_base";
};
freq_domain_table1 : freq_table {
reg = < >, < >, < > ;
reg-names = "perf_base", "lut_base", "en_base";
};
On 5/23/2018 7:48 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 12:48 AM, Viresh Kumar <viresh.ku...@linaro.org> wrote:
On 22-05-18, 14:31, Rob Herring wrote:
On Sat, May 19, 2018 at 11:04:50PM +0530, Taniya Das wrote:
+ freq-domain-0 {
+ compatible = "cpufreq";
+ reg = <0x17d43920 0x4>,
+ <0x17d43110 0x500>,
+ <0x17d41000 0x4>;
+ reg-names = "perf_base", "lut_base", "en_base";
+ qcom,cpulist = <&CPU0 &CPU1 &CPU2 &CPU3>;
I was thinking, can't we add platform specific properties in the CPU
nodes ? If yes, then we can point the phandle of fw node from the CPUs
and this awkward list can go away.
Yes, that's fine. That would be more like OPP binding in that the CPU
points to the OPP table rather than the OPP pointing to the CPUs.
With that, you can get rid of the child nodes completely. Just make
the parent reg property N sets of 3 addresses for N domains.
Rob
--
QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member
of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation.
--
