On 05/26/2018 11:16 AM, kbuild test robot wrote: > Hi Marek, > > I love your patch! Perhaps something to improve: > > [auto build test WARNING on ljones-mfd/for-mfd-next] > [also build test WARNING on v4.17-rc6] > [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to > help improve the system] > > url: > https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Marek-Vasut/mfd-da9063-Rename-PMIC_DA9063-to-PMIC_CHIP_ID_DA9063/20180526-162613 > base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/lee/mfd.git > for-mfd-next > config: x86_64-randconfig-x002-201820 (attached as .config) > compiler: gcc-7 (Debian 7.3.0-16) 7.3.0 > reproduce: > # save the attached .config to linux build tree > make ARCH=x86_64 > > All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): > > In file included from include/linux/kernel.h:10:0, > from drivers//regulator/da9063-regulator.c:16: > drivers//regulator/da9063-regulator.c: In function > 'da9063_regulator_probe': > drivers//regulator/da9063-regulator.c:744:12: error: 'const struct > da9063_dev_model' has no member named 'dev_model' > if (model->dev_model == da9063->type) > ^ > include/linux/compiler.h:58:30: note: in definition of macro '__trace_if' > if (__builtin_constant_p(!!(cond)) ? !!(cond) : \ > ^~~~ >>> drivers//regulator/da9063-regulator.c:744:3: note: in expansion of macro >>> 'if' > if (model->dev_model == da9063->type) > ^~ > drivers//regulator/da9063-regulator.c:744:12: error: 'const struct > da9063_dev_model' has no member named 'dev_model' > if (model->dev_model == da9063->type) > ^ > include/linux/compiler.h:58:42: note: in definition of macro '__trace_if' > if (__builtin_constant_p(!!(cond)) ? !!(cond) : \ > ^~~~ >>> drivers//regulator/da9063-regulator.c:744:3: note: in expansion of macro >>> 'if' > if (model->dev_model == da9063->type) > ^~ > drivers//regulator/da9063-regulator.c:744:12: error: 'const struct > da9063_dev_model' has no member named 'dev_model' > if (model->dev_model == da9063->type) > ^ > include/linux/compiler.h:69:16: note: in definition of macro '__trace_if' > ______r = !!(cond); \ > ^~~~ >>> drivers//regulator/da9063-regulator.c:744:3: note: in expansion of macro >>> 'if' > if (model->dev_model == da9063->type) > ^~ > drivers//regulator/da9063-regulator.c:749:10: error: 'struct da9063' has > no member named 'model' > da9063->model); > ^~ > > vim +/if +744 drivers//regulator/da9063-regulator.c
Is it testing this patch without the other patches in the series or at least 1/6 ? -- Best regards, Marek Vasut
