On Sun, May 27, 2018 at 4:28 AM, Eugene Syromiatnikov <e...@redhat.com> wrote: > Use __aligned_u64 instead of __u64 everywhere in the UAPI header, > similarly to v4.17-rc1~94^2~58^2 "RDMA: Change all uapi headers to use > __aligned_u64 instead of __u64". > > This commit doesn't change structure layouts, but imposes additional > alignment requirements on struct bpf_stack_build_id, struct > bpf_sock_ops, struct bpf_perf_event_value, and struct > bpf_raw_tracepoint_args; of them only struct bpf_sock_ops and struct > bpf_perf_event_value have 64-bit fields that were present in a released > kernel without this additional alignment requirement (bytes_received > and bytes_acked were added to struct bpf_sock_ops in commit > v4.16-rc1~123^2~33^2~5^2~4, struct bpf_perf_event_value was added > in commit v4.15-rc1~84^2~532^2~3). > > Signed-off-by: Eugene Syromiatnikov <e...@redhat.com> > --- > include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 22 +++++++++++----------- > tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 22 +++++++++++----------- > 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h > index 903010a..174e99a 100644 > --- a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h > @@ -259,8 +259,8 @@ struct bpf_stack_build_id { > __s32 status; > unsigned char build_id[BPF_BUILD_ID_SIZE]; > union { > - __u64 offset; > - __u64 ip; > + __aligned_u64 offset; > + __aligned_u64 ip; > }; > }; > > @@ -288,7 +288,7 @@ union bpf_attr { > __aligned_u64 value; > __aligned_u64 next_key; > }; > - __u64 flags; > + __aligned_u64 flags; > }; > > struct { /* anonymous struct used by BPF_PROG_LOAD command */ > @@ -360,7 +360,7 @@ union bpf_attr { > } query; > > struct { > - __u64 name; > + __aligned_u64 name; > __u32 prog_fd; > } raw_tracepoint; > } __attribute__((aligned(8))); > @@ -1011,7 +1011,7 @@ struct bpf_prog_info { > __u32 xlated_prog_len; > __aligned_u64 jited_prog_insns; > __aligned_u64 xlated_prog_insns; > - __u64 load_time; /* ns since boottime */ > + __aligned_u64 load_time; /* ns since boottime */ > __u32 created_by_uid; > __u32 nr_map_ids; > __aligned_u64 map_ids; > @@ -1101,8 +1101,8 @@ struct bpf_sock_ops { > __u32 lost_out; > __u32 sacked_out; > __u32 sk_txhash; > - __u64 bytes_received; > - __u64 bytes_acked; > + __aligned_u64 bytes_received; > + __aligned_u64 bytes_acked; > }; > > /* Definitions for bpf_sock_ops_cb_flags */ > @@ -1189,9 +1189,9 @@ enum { > #define TCP_BPF_SNDCWND_CLAMP 1002 /* Set sndcwnd_clamp */ > > struct bpf_perf_event_value { > - __u64 counter; > - __u64 enabled; > - __u64 running; > + __aligned_u64 counter; > + __aligned_u64 enabled; > + __aligned_u64 running; > }; > > #define BPF_DEVCG_ACC_MKNOD (1ULL << 0) > @@ -1209,7 +1209,7 @@ struct bpf_cgroup_dev_ctx { > }; > > struct bpf_raw_tracepoint_args { > - __u64 args[0]; > + __aligned_u64 args[0]; > }; > > #endif /* _UAPI__LINUX_BPF_H__ */ > diff --git a/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h b/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h > index 903010a..174e99a 100644 > --- a/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h > +++ b/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h > @@ -259,8 +259,8 @@ struct bpf_stack_build_id { > __s32 status; > unsigned char build_id[BPF_BUILD_ID_SIZE]; > union { > - __u64 offset; > - __u64 ip; > + __aligned_u64 offset; > + __aligned_u64 ip; > }; > }; > > @@ -288,7 +288,7 @@ union bpf_attr { > __aligned_u64 value; > __aligned_u64 next_key; > }; > - __u64 flags; > + __aligned_u64 flags; > }; > > struct { /* anonymous struct used by BPF_PROG_LOAD command */ > @@ -360,7 +360,7 @@ union bpf_attr { > } query; > > struct { > - __u64 name; > + __aligned_u64 name; > __u32 prog_fd; > } raw_tracepoint; > } __attribute__((aligned(8))); > @@ -1011,7 +1011,7 @@ struct bpf_prog_info { > __u32 xlated_prog_len; > __aligned_u64 jited_prog_insns; > __aligned_u64 xlated_prog_insns; > - __u64 load_time; /* ns since boottime */ > + __aligned_u64 load_time; /* ns since boottime */ > __u32 created_by_uid; > __u32 nr_map_ids; > __aligned_u64 map_ids; > @@ -1101,8 +1101,8 @@ struct bpf_sock_ops { > __u32 lost_out; > __u32 sacked_out; > __u32 sk_txhash; > - __u64 bytes_received; > - __u64 bytes_acked; > + __aligned_u64 bytes_received; > + __aligned_u64 bytes_acked; > }; > > /* Definitions for bpf_sock_ops_cb_flags */ > @@ -1189,9 +1189,9 @@ enum { > #define TCP_BPF_SNDCWND_CLAMP 1002 /* Set sndcwnd_clamp */ > > struct bpf_perf_event_value { > - __u64 counter; > - __u64 enabled; > - __u64 running; > + __aligned_u64 counter; > + __aligned_u64 enabled; > + __aligned_u64 running; > }; > > #define BPF_DEVCG_ACC_MKNOD (1ULL << 0) > @@ -1209,7 +1209,7 @@ struct bpf_cgroup_dev_ctx { > }; > > struct bpf_raw_tracepoint_args { > - __u64 args[0]; > + __aligned_u64 args[0]; > }; > > #endif /* _UAPI__LINUX_BPF_H__ */ > -- > 2.1.4 >
I think these changes are not necessary. Is it a general guidance to only use 64-bit aligned variables in UAPI headers? Thanks, Song