Quoting Lee Jones (2018-05-30 04:16:49) > On Tue, 29 May 2018, Matti Vaittinen wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 08:39:58AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote: > > > On Mon, 28 May 2018, Matti Vaittinen wrote: > > > > > > > Patch series adding support for ROHM BD71837 PMIC. > > > FYI, this patch-set is going to be difficult to manage since it was > > > not sent 'threaded'. > > > > > > If/when you send a subsequent version, could you please ensure you > > > send the set threaded so the patches keep in relation to one another > > > as they are reviewed? > > > > Thanks for the guidance. I have not sent so many patches to community so > > I am grateful also from all the practical tips =) Just one slight problem. > > I have only seen emails being threaded when one is replying to an email. > > So how should I send my patches in same thread? Just send first one and > > then send subsequent patches as replies? > > > > I just killed some unused definitions and one unused variable from the > > code so I am about to send new version. I'll try doing that as a threaded > > series and resend all the patches as v3. > > You don't need to do this manually. > > Just use `git send-email` with the correct arguments. >
I usually send with 'git send-email *.patch' so that git can do the threading for me. Looks like these patches were sent with Mutt though, so perhaps 'git format-patch | git imap-send' was used without the --thread option on format-patch.
