Hello, On Fri, Jun 01, 2018 at 01:11:59PM -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > Widening the definition of a process sounds good. The memory control > group code would still need a way to forbid these in cgroup v1 mode, > when someone uses the task file.
Yeap, you're right. We'll need memcg's can_attach rejecting for v1. > Using widening instead of denying should reduce the risk of introducing > a regression. > > The only reason I support the crazy case in my earlier patch is so that > we can have this discussion and in case we do cause a regression with > this change the previous algorithmic cleanup won't have to be reverted > as well. Yeah, sure thing. Thanks a lot. -- tejun