On Sun, May 20, 2018 at 12:07:17AM +0200, Maciej S. Szmigiero wrote:
> Convert the early loader in the AMD microcode update driver to use the
> container data checking functions introduced by the previous commit.
> 
> We have to be careful to call these functions with 'early' parameter set,
> so they won't try to print errors as the early loader runs too early for
> printk()-style functions to work.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Maciej S. Szmigiero <[email protected]>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/amd.c | 59 ++++++++++++++++-------------
>  1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/amd.c 
> b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/amd.c
> index f9485ff7183c..f4c7479a961c 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/amd.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/amd.c
> @@ -224,29 +224,36 @@ static bool verify_patch(u8 family, const u8 *buf, 
> size_t buf_size, bool early)
>   * Returns the amount of bytes consumed while scanning. @desc contains all 
> the
>   * data we're going to use in later stages of the application.
>   */
> -static ssize_t parse_container(u8 *ucode, ssize_t size, struct cont_desc 
> *desc)
> +static size_t parse_container(u8 *ucode, size_t size, struct cont_desc *desc)
>  {
>       struct equiv_cpu_entry *eq;
> -     ssize_t orig_size = size;
> +     size_t orig_size = size;
>       u32 *hdr = (u32 *)ucode;
> +     u32 equiv_tbl_len;
>       u16 eq_id;
>       u8 *buf;
>  
> -     /* Am I looking at an equivalence table header? */
> -     if (hdr[0] != UCODE_MAGIC ||
> -         hdr[1] != UCODE_EQUIV_CPU_TABLE_TYPE ||
> -         hdr[2] == 0)
> -             return CONTAINER_HDR_SZ;
> +     /*
> +      * Skip one byte when a container cannot be parsed successfully
> +      * so the parser will correctly skip unknown data of any size until
> +      * it hopefully arrives at something that it is able to recognize.
> +      */
> +     if (!verify_container(ucode, size, true) ||
> +         !verify_equivalence_table(ucode, size, true))

That function already calls verify_container().

> +             return 1;
>  
>       buf = ucode;
>  
> +     equiv_tbl_len = hdr[2];
>       eq = (struct equiv_cpu_entry *)(buf + CONTAINER_HDR_SZ);
>  
>       /* Find the equivalence ID of our CPU in this table: */
>       eq_id = find_equiv_id(eq, desc->cpuid_1_eax);
>  
> -     buf  += hdr[2] + CONTAINER_HDR_SZ;
> -     size -= hdr[2] + CONTAINER_HDR_SZ;
> +     buf  += CONTAINER_HDR_SZ;
> +     buf  += equiv_tbl_len;
> +     size -= CONTAINER_HDR_SZ;
> +     size -= equiv_tbl_len;
>  
>       /*
>        * Scan through the rest of the container to find where it ends. We do
> @@ -258,25 +265,27 @@ static ssize_t parse_container(u8 *ucode, ssize_t size, 
> struct cont_desc *desc)
>  
>               hdr = (u32 *)buf;
>  
> -             if (hdr[0] != UCODE_UCODE_TYPE)
> +             if (!verify_patch_section(buf, size, true))
>                       break;
>  
> -             /* Sanity-check patch size. */
>               patch_size = hdr[1];
> -             if (patch_size > PATCH_MAX_SIZE)
> -                     break;
>  
> -             /* Skip patch section header: */
> -             buf  += SECTION_HDR_SIZE;
> -             size -= SECTION_HDR_SIZE;
> +             mc = (struct microcode_amd *)(buf + SECTION_HDR_SIZE);
> +             if (eq_id != mc->hdr.processor_rev_id)
> +                     goto next_patch;
>  
> -             mc = (struct microcode_amd *)buf;
> -             if (eq_id == mc->hdr.processor_rev_id) {
> -                     desc->psize = patch_size;
> -                     desc->mc = mc;
> -             }
> +             if (!verify_patch(x86_family(desc->cpuid_1_eax), buf, size,
> +                               true))

Let it stick out.

Ok, so above you do verify_patch_section() and then you take patch_size
without fully verifying it - it can be something non-sensically huge and
thus we might skip over good patches.

What you should do instead is call verify_patch() directly - which
already calls verify_patch_section() and if the patch size exceeds the
per-family maximum, return *that* instead and skip only the per family
maximum inside the buffer so that any patches following can get a chance
to get inspected.

For that you'll have to reshuffle the change of integrating
verify_patch_size() to happen before that change here.

Thx.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.

Reply via email to