Hi!
> >>> + { "hp4-bluetooth", },
> >>> + {},
> >>> +};
> >>> +
> >>> static struct serdev_device_driver nokia_bluetooth_serdev_driver = {
> >>> .probe = nokia_bluetooth_serdev_probe,
> >>> .remove = nokia_bluetooth_serdev_remove,
> >>> @@ -809,6 +814,7 @@ static struct serdev_device_driver
> >>> nokia_bluetooth_serdev_driver = {
> >>> .pm = &nokia_bluetooth_pm_ops,
> >>> .of_match_table = of_match_ptr(nokia_bluetooth_of_match),
> >>> },
> >>> + .id_table = nokia_bluetooth_serdev_id,
> >>> };
> >>
> >> I would actually skip this hardware. First of all it is such a dedicated
> >> custom Nokia transport and hardware, and secondly it is no longer produced
> >> anyway.
> >>
> >
> > Would it make sense to cc: sre here? We want good support even for old
> > hardware, and this is n9/n950, it is still on "top ten supported
> > phones" list... Probably even top 5.
>
> but that is not what this patch series is about. We do not need new_id kinda
> support for the existing hardware. My point is there will be no newly
> designed hardware using this driver.
>
You are right, new hardware with that protocol sounds unlikely at this
point.
Sorry for the noise,
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures)
http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
