3.16.57-rc1 review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Joe Lawrence <[email protected]>

commit fb910c42ccebf853c29296185c45c11164a56098 upstream.

Mikulas noticed in the existing do_proc_douintvec_minmax_conv() and
do_proc_dopipe_max_size_conv() introduced in this patchset, that they
inconsistently handle overflow and min/max range inputs:

For example:

  0 ... param->min - 1 ---> ERANGE
  param->min ... param->max ---> the value is accepted
  param->max + 1 ... 0x100000000L + param->min - 1 ---> ERANGE
  0x100000000L + param->min ... 0x100000000L + param->max ---> EINVAL
  0x100000000L + param->max + 1, 0x200000000L + param->min - 1 ---> ERANGE
  0x200000000L + param->min ... 0x200000000L + param->max ---> EINVAL
  0x200000000L + param->max + 1, 0x300000000L + param->min - 1 ---> ERANGE

In do_proc_do*() routines which store values into unsigned int variables
(4 bytes wide for 64-bit builds), first validate that the input unsigned
long value (8 bytes wide for 64-bit builds) will fit inside the smaller
unsigned int variable.  Then check that the unsigned int value falls
inside the specified parameter min, max range.  Otherwise the unsigned
long -> unsigned int conversion drops leading bits from the input value,
leading to the inconsistent pattern Mikulas documented above.

Link: 
http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Joe Lawrence <[email protected]>
Reported-by: Mikulas Patocka <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Mikulas Patocka <[email protected]>
Cc: Al Viro <[email protected]>
Cc: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
Cc: Michael Kerrisk <[email protected]>
Cc: Randy Dunlap <[email protected]>
Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
[bwh: Backported to 3.16:
 - Drop changes in do_proc_douintvec_minmax_conv()
 - Adjust context]
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <[email protected]>
---
--- a/kernel/sysctl.c
+++ b/kernel/sysctl.c
@@ -2233,17 +2233,18 @@ static int do_proc_dopipe_max_size_conv(
        struct do_proc_dopipe_max_size_conv_param *param = data;
 
        if (write) {
-               unsigned int val = round_pipe_size(*lvalp);
+               unsigned int val;
 
+               if (*lvalp > UINT_MAX)
+                       return -EINVAL;
+
+               val = round_pipe_size(*lvalp);
                if (*negp || val == 0)
                        return -EINVAL;
 
                if (param->min && *param->min > val)
                        return -ERANGE;
 
-               if (*lvalp > UINT_MAX)
-                       return -EINVAL;
-
                *valp = val;
        } else {
                unsigned int val = *valp;

Reply via email to