3.16.57-rc1 review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" <[email protected]>

commit 3734a13b96ebf039b293d8d37a934fd1bd9e03ab upstream.

This is a preparatory patch for following work. account_pipe_buffers()
performs accounting in the 'user_struct'. There is no need to pass a
pointer to a 'pipe_inode_info' struct (which is then dereferenced to
obtain a pointer to the 'user' field). Instead, pass a pointer directly
to the 'user_struct'. This change is needed in preparation for a
subsequent patch that the fixes the limit checking in alloc_pipe_info()
(and the resulting code is a little more logical).

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Michael Kerrisk <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Vegard Nossum <[email protected]>
Cc: Willy Tarreau <[email protected]>
Cc: <[email protected]>
Cc: Tetsuo Handa <[email protected]>
Cc: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
Cc: Al Viro <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <[email protected]>
---
 fs/pipe.c | 10 +++++-----
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

--- a/fs/pipe.c
+++ b/fs/pipe.c
@@ -590,10 +590,10 @@ pipe_fasync(int fd, struct file *filp, i
        return retval;
 }
 
-static void account_pipe_buffers(struct pipe_inode_info *pipe,
+static void account_pipe_buffers(struct user_struct *user,
                                  unsigned long old, unsigned long new)
 {
-       atomic_long_add(new - old, &pipe->user->pipe_bufs);
+       atomic_long_add(new - old, &user->pipe_bufs);
 }
 
 static bool too_many_pipe_buffers_soft(struct user_struct *user)
@@ -628,7 +628,7 @@ struct pipe_inode_info *alloc_pipe_info(
                        pipe->r_counter = pipe->w_counter = 1;
                        pipe->buffers = pipe_bufs;
                        pipe->user = user;
-                       account_pipe_buffers(pipe, 0, pipe_bufs);
+                       account_pipe_buffers(user, 0, pipe_bufs);
                        mutex_init(&pipe->mutex);
                        return pipe;
                }
@@ -643,7 +643,7 @@ void free_pipe_info(struct pipe_inode_in
 {
        int i;
 
-       account_pipe_buffers(pipe, pipe->buffers, 0);
+       account_pipe_buffers(pipe->user, pipe->buffers, 0);
        free_uid(pipe->user);
        for (i = 0; i < pipe->buffers; i++) {
                struct pipe_buffer *buf = pipe->bufs + i;
@@ -1062,7 +1062,7 @@ static long pipe_set_size(struct pipe_in
                        memcpy(bufs + head, pipe->bufs, tail * sizeof(struct 
pipe_buffer));
        }
 
-       account_pipe_buffers(pipe, pipe->buffers, nr_pages);
+       account_pipe_buffers(pipe->user, pipe->buffers, nr_pages);
        pipe->curbuf = 0;
        kfree(pipe->bufs);
        pipe->bufs = bufs;

Reply via email to