3.16.57-rc1 review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Julia Lawall <[email protected]>

commit 3a61b527b4e1f285d21b6e9e623dc45cf8bb391f upstream.

Check the variable that was most recently initialized.

The semantic match that finds this problem is as follows:
(http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)

// <smpl>
@@
expression x, y, f, g, e, m;
statement S1,S2,S3,S4;
@@

x = f(...);
if (\(<+...x...+>\&e\)) S1 else S2
(
x = g(...);
|
m = g(...,&x,...);
|
y = g(...);
*if (e)
 S3 else S4
)
// </smpl>

Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Christian König <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <[email protected]>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_uvd.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_uvd.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_uvd.c
@@ -950,7 +950,7 @@ int radeon_uvd_calc_upll_dividers(struct
                /* calc dclk divider with current vco freq */
                dclk_div = radeon_uvd_calc_upll_post_div(vco_freq, dclk,
                                                         pd_min, pd_even);
-               if (vclk_div > pd_max)
+               if (dclk_div > pd_max)
                        break; /* vco is too big, it has to stop */
 
                /* calc score with current vco freq */

Reply via email to