3.16.57-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------ From: Dave Hansen <[email protected]> commit 4b3b234f434d440fcd749b9636131b76e2ce561e upstream. Len Brown noticed something was amiss in our INTEL_FAM6_* definitions. It seems like model 0x1F was a Nehalem part, marketed as "Intel Core i7 and i5 Processors" (according to the SDM). But, although it was a Nehalem 0x1F had some uncore events which were shared with Westmere. Len also mentioned he thought it was called "Havendale", which Wikipedia says was graphics-oriented and canceled: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nehalem_(microarchitecture) So either way, it's probably not imporant what we call it, but call it Nehalem to be accurate, and add a "G" since it seems graphics-related. If it were canceled that would be a good reason why it's so sparsely and inconsistently referred to in the code. Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <[email protected]> Cc: Dave Hansen <[email protected]> Cc: Len Brown <[email protected]> Cc: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> [bwh: Backported to 3.16: drop changes in intel_idle.c] Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <[email protected]> --- arch/x86/include/asm/intel-family.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/intel-family.h +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/intel-family.h @@ -18,10 +18,10 @@ #define INTEL_FAM6_CORE2_DUNNINGTON 0x1D #define INTEL_FAM6_NEHALEM 0x1E +#define INTEL_FAM6_NEHALEM_G 0x1F /* Auburndale / Havendale */ #define INTEL_FAM6_NEHALEM_EP 0x1A #define INTEL_FAM6_NEHALEM_EX 0x2E #define INTEL_FAM6_WESTMERE 0x25 -#define INTEL_FAM6_WESTMERE2 0x1F #define INTEL_FAM6_WESTMERE_EP 0x2C #define INTEL_FAM6_WESTMERE_EX 0x2F
