On 07/06/18 17:41, Alban wrote:
AFAIU the only thing that we disagree on now is if the nodes
representing the cells should be direct children of the provider
or in a dedicated subnode. For the MTD case both solution would solve
the binding clash. I would really appreciate if the DT people could
Am reluctant in changing the nvmem generic bindings for a special case.
Can you try this with your original subnode proposal:
just pass the subnode node pointer in np of nvmem_config:
------------------------->cut<------------------------------------
diff --git a/drivers/nvmem/core.c b/drivers/nvmem/core.c
index b05aa8e81303..c9621632bbfb 100644
--- a/drivers/nvmem/core.c
+++ b/drivers/nvmem/core.c
@@ -472,7 +472,11 @@ struct nvmem_device *nvmem_register(const struct
nvmem_config *config)
nvmem->priv = config->priv;
nvmem->reg_read = config->reg_read;
nvmem->reg_write = config->reg_write;
- nvmem->dev.of_node = config->dev->of_node;
+
+ if (config->np)
+ nvmem->dev.of_node = config->np;
+ else
+ nvmem->dev.of_node = config->dev->of_node;
if (config->id == -1 && config->name) {
dev_set_name(&nvmem->dev, "%s", config->name);
diff --git a/include/linux/nvmem-provider.h b/include/linux/nvmem-provider.h
index f89598bc4e1c..743345ffe2c8 100644
--- a/include/linux/nvmem-provider.h
+++ b/include/linux/nvmem-provider.h
@@ -49,6 +49,7 @@ typedef int (*nvmem_reg_write_t)(void *priv, unsigned
int offset,
*/
struct nvmem_config {
struct device *dev;
+ struct device_node *np;
const char *name;
int id;
struct module *owner;
------------------------->cut<------------------------------------
thanks,
srini
chip in so that we can settle this and get the MTD support merged.
