On Fri, 2007-06-15 at 19:52 -0500, Scott Preece wrote: > > Yes, but in highlighting the possibility of evil intentions you > distort the fact that usually there are no such evil intentions... >
I don't think you can use "usually" and "fact" together like that. Why is it so bad to account for them since they (do) surface and (could) increase significantly in frequency? For me, the (could) is enough to act upon, regardless of the current likely hood of it happening. Things change frequently. This, unfortunately comes pre-distorted depending on what you believe. All of us are right but we still don't agree. Quite a fluke. That's the problem. Best, --Tim - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
