On Tue, 12 Jun 2018 02:57:48 +0200
Karim Eshapa <karim.esh...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Use sign_extend32 kernel function instead of code duplication.
> Safe also for 16 bit.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Karim Eshapa <karim.esh...@gmail.com>

Please resend as a fresh patch marked at V2 with a change log below the ---
so we can easily see what has changed.

Thanks,

Jonathan

> ---
>  drivers/staging/iio/accel/adis16240.c | 11 ++---------
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/iio/accel/adis16240.c 
> b/drivers/staging/iio/accel/adis16240.c
> index fff6d99089cc..24e525f1ef25 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/iio/accel/adis16240.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/iio/accel/adis16240.c
> @@ -250,7 +250,6 @@ static int adis16240_read_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
>  {
>       struct adis *st = iio_priv(indio_dev);
>       int ret;
> -     int bits;
>       u8 addr;
>       s16 val16;
>  
> @@ -287,24 +286,18 @@ static int adis16240_read_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
>               *val = 25000 / 244 - 0x133; /* 25 C = 0x133 */
>               return IIO_VAL_INT;
>       case IIO_CHAN_INFO_CALIBBIAS:
> -             bits = 10;
>               addr = adis16240_addresses[chan->scan_index][0];
>               ret = adis_read_reg_16(st, addr, &val16);
>               if (ret)
>                       return ret;
> -             val16 &= (1 << bits) - 1;
> -             val16 = (s16)(val16 << (16 - bits)) >> (16 - bits);
> -             *val = val16;
> +             *val = sign_extend32(val16, 9);
>               return IIO_VAL_INT;
>       case IIO_CHAN_INFO_PEAK:
> -             bits = 10;
>               addr = adis16240_addresses[chan->scan_index][1];
>               ret = adis_read_reg_16(st, addr, &val16);
>               if (ret)
>                       return ret;
> -             val16 &= (1 << bits) - 1;
> -             val16 = (s16)(val16 << (16 - bits)) >> (16 - bits);
> -             *val = val16;
> +             *val = sign_extend32(val16, 9);
>               return IIO_VAL_INT;
>       }
>       return -EINVAL;


Reply via email to